QUESTIONS
& ANSWERS |
Kristina |
BD |
Blau-Duncan model:
association between father’s education and father’s occupation is
bidirectional (line has two arrows). When we calculate indirect effect of
father’s occupation on respondent’s first job through father’s education and
respondent’s education (like in the lecture) do we have to presume that
father’s occupation causes father’s education? HG: No, but you have to
take the arrow into account when making the calculations. This bi-directional
arrow then represents a confounding effect. BD address the issue on p166. If
the focus is on occupational attainment, it is convenient to drop FED from
the model, and use a total effect of 0.454 (0.270 + 0.516*0.310). Part of
this is spurious, but who cares? |
8 |
Ave |
CMLR |
Does CMLR require before the analysis the change of the
structure of the data to the format described in the table 8 (Dessens et al
2003: 75)? HG: Yes, you need to redefine the data-matrix itself, even
if you use stata to estimate the model. Stata has nice routines to do this,
but you can do the same redefinition by saving multiple files and then add
them in SPSS. |
9 |
Ave |
CMLR |
Dessens et al (2003: 76) state, that "the uniform
association between origin and destination categories diminishes over
time". Where could i see it in the table 9 (Dessens et all. 2003:
77-79)? What shows that? HG: You see this in the significantly negative effects
U*EYR on p15. A decline of -.06 would say that U goes down by approximately
1.3% each year. |
9 |
Siim |
Communism |
What influence has communist
period if we compare Western and Eastern Europe, is there some aspects what
should take into account if we compare for example educational levels or
occupational division? HG: Of course, this is a problem
when analyzing or comparing with data from the communist period, but the
problem is mostly with the awkward occupational classifications that were
then used, not so much with the organization of work itself. If you use a non-communist
classification, e.g. ISCO for classifying parents or first jobs, there is
usually little problem. Like always and everywhere, the problems arise mostly
with how farm work is organized. For education, I do not think there were
very specific educational regimes that are unique to communist nations. |
9 |
Lea |
Communism |
To whole course. Does ISCO or other classifications fit to
post-communist countries like Estonia? In these countries all economic, social
and other systems where destroyed in the soviet time, all persons where
equally poor and I think that meanings or status of professions may be
totally different. For example teacher is respected and well paid in Finland,
but in Estonia it is despised profession. HG: This is not true, not now, and it was not true in
communist times either. I do not believe that teacher is a despised
profession in Estonia now, nor anywhere else. But I have heard the same
complaints about teachers in the Netherlands. |
7 |
Tarmo |
Comparative mobility |
I would like to know more about your future plans concerning
this kind of research and, more generally, about the feasibility of such
grand comparative study of stratification (or of social mobility, more
specifically). HG: I am still working an a large scale comparison, but it
needs to meet a few important criteria (A) real large scale, both in
countries and time periods, (B) multivariate, (C) discrete data analysis. I
am still working on it. |
8 |
Tarmo |
Comparative mobility |
Continuing the same topic, there seem to be two opinions
about cross-country differences in social mobility. There is the
Goldthorpe-Erikson school that seems to believe that there are no
between-country differences in social mobility (when mobility is
appropriately defined). And then there is the Ganzeboom-Treiman school that
seems to have discovered systematic differences between countries in terms of
mobility. What is the present situation in this disagreement? HG: I think most researchers agree that GT had it right –
in particular this is rigorously confirmed by Breen’s “Social Mobility in
Europe” and acknowledged by Hout & DiPrete. |
7 |
Siim |
Education |
Regarding
article Measuring and Modeling Education Levels in European Societies. Would
it be better to measure achieved education through real output (I mean what
kind of skills graduates really got). HG:
Skill assessment (see PIAAC) is not so easy either. Why not use directly
observable outcomes such as occupation, earnings or spouses occupation? |
8 |
Lea |
Education |
Article "Nominal comparability is not enough..."
From this article comes out, that in Estonia educational attainment is less
important for occupational status attainment than in most other countries. It
seems to be true. Do you have some explanation, why it can be so? HG: I am not so sure that this is true. I believe that the
measurement of education in the Estonian ESS, first round, contains errors. |
8 |
Ave |
Education |
If education is measured in levels, is it ok to recode the
variable in such a way that the levels will be substituted with number of
years it typically takes to achieve that level of education and use it as
numeric variable (independent variable in multinomial logistic regression). HG: this is a reasonable approach that ISLED tries to
improve upon. The problem of ‘institutional duration’ is that is biases
levels that take long, but have in fact lower levels – these are taken by
dumb kids. This is often the case in highly stratified systems with
vocational tracks. The error is small, but ISLED takes it out. |
7 |
Ellen |
EGP |
In the method EGP you have called in the occupational
sector group a).... b) manual c) non-manual. Could you use Intellectual
instead of non-manual? If not,
then why? HG: Yes, I sometimes do this in Dutch, where we also use
“hoofdarbeid” (=”working with your head”) as phrase, but this has no
acceptable equivalent in English. There may still be confusing about what you
mean. E.g. routine sales work (cashier in a supermarket) is non-manual work,
but is it intellectual? |
7 |
Ellen |
EGP |
Why is skill level the last thing to consider in
classification methods? I have found it most valuable when evaluating
jobs. HG: In fact, in the ISCOàEGP recodes skill is considered
first (and derives from the occupation code itself), but then gets
transformed by employment status. This means in practice that employment
status (= self-employed or supervisor) take priority over skill requirements.
I agree that this is a weakness in class typologies a la Goldthorpe. In fact,
self- employed versions of sales workers and skilled manual workers look much
more similar to salaried versions of these jobs than to each other/ HG: Or did you mean the skill priority rule in coding
occupations? I thing it comes after the numerical dominance rule, and that is
reasonable. |
7 |
Kristina |
EGP/ESEC |
Rose and Harrison (2007)
describe that ESeC measurement of socio-economic class bases on type of
contract. How adequate is this measure in different European countries
(especially since professionals might do project-based work and have
short-term contract)? HG: I think that the whole
contract business does not enter the actual construction of ESEC at all, it
is just “theoretical background”. Moreover, everything they say about
contracts (such as about pension rights) is particularly British and would
not carry far in many European countries. |
8 |
Kristina |
Ethnicity |
Hout and DiPrete (2006)
mention that gender difference in the association between origins and
destinations are absent (although occupational destinations differ). Could we
expect something similar for ethnic groups? Would it make sense to look at
ethnic groups separately in log-linear analysis (in one country)? HG: No, these seem to
be very different things to me. Men
and women have the same fathers, but blacks and whites have not. |
6 |
Kristina |
GTU |
Ganzeboom, Treiman and
Ultee (1991) mention opportunity for an institutional theory of social
mobility. Is there ways to include institutional factors and different
countries in the analysis of social mobility (including in the same model)? HG: We bring this up in the
context of macro-theory, so how does status attainment vary across time and
countries. One theory (modernization theory) would relate this to economic
growth and related processes of modernization. Many people think
modernization theory does not work (Hout & DiPrete). GTU observe that
many researchers have pointed out that variation in status attainment of
related to institutional factors, such political regime, welfare state regimes,
educational structure, women’s rights, but we feel that no one has produced a
theory on these factors that can really compete with modernization theory. |
7 |
Siim |
Income |
Regarding
the article about “How to measure Income“. We ask different types of income,
but should we not give more attention to tax levels (taxes directly related to
labour) and rather compare tax levels to income levels? HG: (A)
I think it makes a big difference whether you are interested in incomes as
outcomes, our income as asset. In the latter case, you want to adjust raw
income measures for taxes, purchasing power, household equivalents, but not
if your research question is about (e.g.) returns to education. HG: (B)
Income measures are often composites of several underlying components. The
composition in not always an addition or average. This makes income
particularly vulnerable to measurement error, because the measurement errors
of the components may multiply, not cancel each other out. |
8 |
Ave |
Income |
Could you please explain more clearly what is Atkinson
index and what are the ways of using it (Warner, Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik 2003 write
about it)? HG: No, I cannot, I would have to consult wikipedia. |
8 |
Lea |
Income |
How we can account persons who declared, that their
household income is below 0? In my work I get very often declarations, that
family’s income is much lower than rent and other expenditure for flat. They
are not lying: grandmother gives potatoes, mother helps with some food,
friends give sometimes something. How to declare this? HG: True household incomes cannot be negative – otherwise
the respondent would have died and not answered your questionnaire. In
practice it means that you have not included all forms of income. Put them
all on a very low number (not zero, because log(0) in not defined). If this
influences your results, omit the cases from the analysis. |
8 |
Lea |
Income |
How to increase the respondent’s motivation to answer the
sensitive questions about income? Is there a way to ask it indirect? How to
understand, that respondent is not telling the truth? HG: I believe that the main reason why people do not
answer income questions is that they do not know their incomes. Refusal is
only a secondary problem. There are two general strategies to cope with the
non-response: (1) present a show-card after an open question and say that an
approximate answer is enough. (2) have them choose below of above the median,
then present the above/below question again for the quartile and octile point
– this gives you 8 categories. |
7 |
Lea |
Income |
In Estonia we mostly use Gini Coefficient as indicator to
compare income inequalities, is there some better indicator and in what
cases? HG: Again, this is a very broad subject, about which many
books have been written. Other than Gini I most often see more descriptively
oriented measure, such as ratio of income of 80th decile / 20th
deciles. Gini is a generalized version of this. |
7 |
Leen |
Income |
Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik & Wolf point out that different type
of research requires different type of questions of income. Could it happen
that too detailed questioning of income leads to bigger ambiguity and errors
in answers and finally leads to loss of information? HG: Yes, I believe this is a big problem in income
measurement and researchers do not seem to pay attention. The income
questions are too complicated and they are combined in non-additive ways. All
of this creates low reliability and is also an important cause of missing
values in income measurents. ESS has a wonderful one-shot question about
household income that works well. |
9 |
Lea |
Income |
For international comparisons of income there are taking
account differences of systems of taxations and social security systems, but
there are more important things to take account as expenditure to education,
to day-care for children and so. How we can compare data from different
countries? HG: this problem is generally treated by using PPI
(purchasing power index), of with the most famous one is the “big mac” index.
However, before you do this, think your problem trough: do you really need
internationally calibrated measure, of is comparison to the local mean income
enough. In this case, simply use log incomes. |
8 |
Mauri |
ISCO |
Where is the most correct place to code assistant
managers, vice presidents, etc? HG: Code assistants with those they are supposed to
assist, unless a specific assistant code exist (which is sometime the case,
e.g. in nursing and teaching). |
8 |
Mauri |
ISCO |
If the occupation of a person consists of 2 different
items, then should we apply the "skill level rule" by choosing the
one requiring higher skill-level? HG: Yes, but first comes the numerical dominance rule. |
8 |
Mauri |
ISCO |
Isn't "skill level rule" opposite to "production rule" (if person is supervisor and worker simultaneously, then by first rule we should code him as supervisor and by 2nd rule - as worker), or perhaps I missed something important about it? HG: Skill rule has priority. |
8 |
Leen |
ISCO |
Can the ISCO type of measures be applied also to
historical data? Maybe it has already been done? I think it might bring
interesting insights to the understanding of status attainment. For instance
all European countries have experienced large-scale urbanization (fed by
demographic change and industrialization), but the timing of this change has
been very different. What is characteristic (particularly to this period) is
that new types of occupations and social ties emerge. This must influence the
pattern of status attainment (social mobility) in a particular way. Is the
need to be aware of the different timing of large-scale social changes like
urbanization, when comparing different countries, a wider concern or it is
not an issue? HG: Occupational stratification is fairly stable across
time, so there is nothing particularly wrong with measuring historical
stratification with ISEI. However, we cannot make an ISEI score for
historical data (because such data typically lack occupational qualifications
and occupational earnings scores, the two ingredients of ISEI. So it is hard
to examine the historical constancy rigorously. Historians have turned to
CAMSIS type scales (social distance) to measure occupational status, as this
can be done with occupational homogamy data that are abundant in historical
records. Marco van Leeuwen and Ineke Maas at Utrecht University
work at this. |
8 |
Ellen |
ISCO |
In my previous work I have noticed that ISCO is too detailed
to use as a classifier and doesn't bring out the different levels of work.
Is there going to be any changes? (I got an answer in the session this
morning already). HG: The new ISCO-08 is even slightly more detailed. If it
I too much, you can always reduce to 3 of 2 digits. |
8 |
Mauri |
ISCO |
If code 1200 is for those managing at least 3
sub-managers, and 1300 for general managers for small businesses, then should
all other mid-level managers be coded under 2000, 3000 or further in case it
is evident that there are not enough sub-managers? HG: I am not sure I understand. If they are managing small
firms with two departments (e.g. production and sales), they should be
in1300. |
7 |
Laur |
ISCO |
What are main advantages of ISCO-08 comparing with
ISCO-88? HG: see: http://www.harryganzeboom.nl/isco08/qa-isco-08.htm and http://www.harryganzeboom.nl/isco08/index.htm. The short answer is: very little. |
7 |
Ellen |
ISCO |
What will be the next-generation codifying system? HG: I will take some time for ISCO-08 to catch on and I
would not expect it to change before 2028. As far a I am concerned, there is no
need to change more often. The 2008 revision has not brought very much
improvement. And most 2008 improvement have little to do with changing
technological conditions. |
7 |
Ave |
ISEI |
Estonian Labour Force Survey has several persons from 1
household (often 2). When analyzing this data, might it be a problem? Should I
take only 1 person from 1 household? I see it as a problem when running
regression analysis for example, where cases in analysis have to be
independent, but if there is more than 1 person from 1 household, then these
cases are not independent. HG: No, do not throw away data. The general answer to this
type of problem are fixed-effects models (available in Stata, R, etc), where
you introduce a dummy variable for each household. Another alternative is to develop an ‘efficiency’ weight,
such as produced by Survey estimation or cluster correction in Stata (and
probably other programs). |
7 |
Ave |
ISEI |
Are there any other theoretical grounds to the
occupational scales other than functionalist and marxian, weberian approach
(Ganzeboom, De Graaf, Treiman 1992: 8 draws some attention to the underlying
theories)? I mean are there other kind of scales based of other theoretical
approaches? HG: Yes there is at least one, it is called relational
scaling, which I would label as weberian (SEI as marxian, prestige as
durkheimian). This derives from marriage or friendship tables and has
traditionally been the sport in Cambridge, not Oxford (Camsis Scale). There
is a 1970’s fight about this in British sociology that continues to this day.
However, recently Goldthorpe (with Chan) has also turned in this direction.
It works quite well. |
9 |
Kristina |
ISEI |
If I analyse children
school performance (with PISA data), does it makes sense to include into
multilevel model parental ISEI, education and financial opportunities (since
ISEI measures the way education is transferred into earnings)? Or would it be
better to use parental ISCO if education and financial opportunities are also
taken into account? HG: important question. I
think it does make sense. Despite being based on education and earnings, ISEI
is still a characteristic of the occupation, not of the person and
his/her assets. You might argue that in such models individual earnings and
education measure how people differ from what is normal in their occupation. |
8 |
Laur |
ISEI |
According to Tartu University demographers about 10% of
Estonian are living or working outside of Estonia. Great amount of them are
working in Scandinavia as builders. Their average income might significantly
influence their occupation position on socio-economic scale. Are this kind of
context-based deviations problem in cross-national comparison (when using
ISEI)? HG: 10%? Really? The problem would only arise if you would
create an Estonian SEI and include emigrants somehow in your data. In ISEI
they have the same status as all construction workers elsewhere, but enjoy
higher income, at least relative to construction workers in Estonia. So that
is the benefit of migration: higher income, but same status. |
6 |
Marko |
ISEI |
The stratification models presented (for example BD model)
don’t consider any cultural factors as influence on social status. Is this
because they don’t matter or are they hard to measure in international
researches? Or is there possibility of reverse causation maybe? HG: It is unclear to me what you would mean by these
“cultural factors”. Education is often referred to as ‘cultural status’ (as
opposed to income = economic status). This is certainly taken into account.
Occupational prestige is also ‘cultural’ (relative to ISEI) and that has gone
out of fashion no because of conceptual problems, but because research has
shown it did not work as well as SEI measures. Other ‘cultural factors’ such
as ethnicity are often addressed in status attainment models, but of course
not part of occupational status measurement. Such reseach analyses whether
ethnic groups have different occupations (with different status). |
6 |
Marko |
ISEI |
Same goes for ISEI scale. It includes only formal
determinants of social status. But social positions of occupations are at the
same time defined by many other factors also. I think this is especially so
with occupations with not very high requirements for education and with not
very high incomes. HG: This has often been an argument in favor of prestige
measures. E.g. many female occupations (nursing) enjoy relatively high
prestige. This sounds conceptually plausible, but I now of no research that
has shown the difference to be important, or even useful empirically.
Empirically, prestige look much more like a weak indicator of occupational
status than an independent dimension. |
6 |
Laur |
ISEI |
Is it okay to use ISEI (and also ISLED) score in linear
regression models? HG: Yes, |
5 |
Mauri |
ISLED |
We spent quite a bit of time with correlation coefficients
demonstrating how good is ISLED vs other measurement methods, but how exactly
ISLED is calculated or derived, was touched rather briefly. HG: I can explain again, but it is not different from how
ISEI was estimated. |
6 |
Kristina |
Loglinear |
Could you explain the idea
of Goodman’s model RCII in CLRM model framework? HG: I have tried in the
lecture. |
8 |
Siim |
Missings |
Second
question is that for me is quite difficult to understand how one can be
assured of the relevance of imputation in social surveys in case of lack of
answers about income from respondent? HG:
Agree. I do not think that we learn very much from imputation, however smart
it is done. In the end it is just technical repair of the completeness of the
data matrix, that works best when the data are missing completely at random
(MCAR) and not when data are systematically missing. I think FIML (Full
Information Maximum Likelihood – in LISREL) is the better way to go. |
8 |
Marko |
Missings |
Holst & Christian (2003) and also Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik & Warner (2003) pointed
out the problem of non-responses in income measurements. What is the standard
policy with those cases, are they just removed from analysis (concerning
stratification models)? HG: There are many possible strategies (and no ‘standard
policy’) to go about missing values in any variable, also income, and their
merits depend much on the situation. There are strategies that substitute
missings, strategies that only use complete cases, and strategies that use
available cases. All of these have merits, and most strategies can be done in
various ways. I have found Paul Allison’s “Missing Data” in the Sage
University Papers quite useful. It has convinced me that Full Information
Maximum Likelihoog (FIML, implemented in Lisrel) and an interesting way to
go. This is an avallable case strategy. |
7 |
Marko |
Missings |
In relation with previous question, what would be the optimal
way (if there is one) for treating missing values in attitude questionnaires? HG: Attitudes are often measured with multiple indicators
and some form of additive scaling. I find Comp mean(items) in SPSS a powerful
way to minimize missing values. If attitudes are analyzed as dependent
variables (often the case), more elaborate forms of substitution hardly make
sense to me. |
7 |
Marko |
Modernization |
Hout and DiPrete, summing up RC28’s plenary session at the
World Congress in HG: Sounds plausible to me, although much of what you say
could also be subsumed under modernization itself. I believe that the
international trends show convergence between countries and this would be in
line with the globalization argument. |
8 |
Leen |
Mothers |
Father’s education seems to be an important variable both in the original Blau&Duncan model and in its extensions. How important is the variable in contemporary research in general? Wouldn’t mother’s education be more important in this respect (at least in those societies where education among women is already widespread)? Assuming the educational homogamy of spouses (that has been shown in different studies) I would expect that the effect of fathers’ education only echoes the actual effect of mother’s education and both probably capture some kind of socialization effect. HG: This is an age-old question that is addressed on p.190
of BD. Their answer is a qualified NO. Introducing mothers changes little to
the family effect if her education is closely related to father’s, which it
is. If it would be not related to father’s (quod non), then it would not
change the father’s effect. Introducing mothers gives you insight how fathers
and mothers relate, but does not change the mobility pattern (=strength of
intergenerational correlations). |
8 |
Siim |
Occupational
mobility |
Some
thoughts after reading article „Occupational Attainment of First Jobs“. We
analyze whether there is a relationship between father’s occupation and
respondent occupation but how does that take into account structural changes
(I mean growth of jobs related to services and for example diminishing in
agriculture or manufacturing)? HG:
Loglinear models are supposedly insensitive to structural mobility – and so
is CLR. Results are not dependent upon the distribution of destinations or
origins. |
7 |
Siim |
Occupations |
Regarding
socioeconomic classification, occupational structure is viewed as the
backbone of the stratification system but how can we ensure comparability
between countries or apply class schema same way, when occupations have
different status in European countries? HG: The
first generalization of Hout & DiPrete is that this is not the case: the ‘Treiman
constant’. I subscribe to this largely: there is little evidence of
systematic variability in evaluation of occupations and even less theory
about it. |
8 |
Leen |
Structural
change |
How does the B&D type of modeling address the
contextual change occurring over time (calendar period)? For instance when
looking at the effect of education (or any other phenomenon that spreads over
time) then people with higher education become less and less selective group.
This means that when education spreads in a society the effect of it must
become weaker not because education is not important anymore, but because it
doesn’t distinguish people so well anymore. This also indicates how difficult
it is to select variables for comparative longitudinal social surveys (it’s
clearly not enough to base one's design solely in one particular social context,
e.g. US in 1970s). HG: I think when educational differentials are shrinking
and make less of a clear signal to employers, this will lead to less
association. This is a real phenomenon, nothing artificial. |
8 |
Leen |
Theory |
The course has addressed many social stratification
indicators; we have seen several different ways to measure education,
occupational status, social class, income, and discussed how to study social
mobility. Some of those measures have clearly emerged from particular social
(and historical) context. I already briefly commented BD model in this
respect; also the British roots of the EGP were discussed in the class. My
question is whether the issue of ethnocentrism has been consciously addressed
while developing any of those models? Can ethnocentrism be avoided? Is it a
bigger problem in some of the areas (education, occupation etc) compared to
the others? HG: Theories should not be judged by whether they start
from ethnocentric or idiosyncratic assumptions or not, but whether they pass
empirical tests. The original Goldthorpe scheme for Britain that did not
contain a specific category for farmers, is not problematic because that
represents a specifically British image of stratification, but because it has
been shown by other research that farmers have very peculiar mobility
patterns, than can and will bias you results, if you do not keep them
separate. This is also true in Britain, they just have fewer of them. |
7 |
Leen |
Women |
In a last lecture you mentioned that in the US there is a
tendency that women increasingly prefer staying longer home with kids instead
of working (if I understood correctly). I wonder could this tendency appear
due to the fact that the share of Hispanic women, who are more
family-oriented in general and who started to emancipate later, has increased
in the population. HG: I think I was giving a hearsay personal impression, I
do not know the facts. Your explanation sounds plausible and could be tested. |
9 |
Ave |
Women |
I have discovered, that mother's variables (occupation,
education) is stronger related to their offspring's occupation than father's
variables. Ellu Saar has mentioned the same (sorry, i have forgotten the
details of this study) and research by Koucky, Bartušek, Kovarovic (2010)
shows, that in Estonia mother's variables are stronger predictors of getting
tertiary education than father's variables. I have tried to use variables
which take higher education and occupation (mother & father combined) as
parental variables, but in that case i found, that the effect is much
smaller, than in the case, when i use them separately, so i would say
mother's and father's effects are different. How would you handle mother's
and father's variables in this case. In all those cases I used multinomial
logistic regression predicting current occupation. HG: Interesting. I have published papers (with Sylvia
Korupp) on this topic and I am working on a new one. Our general finding is
that fathers are more important, but that this differs between men and women
(sex role modeling). Another general finding is that the highest status is
more important and that ‘dominance approach’ works well. There must be
something special with Estonian mothers (or fathers)… Measurement error? |
8 |